Ch. 3 - Relationship

We often hear news about someone killing the person he or she loved because that person had betrayed him or her. We also hear about killing for the love of their community. Then one may ask: what is this thing called love? Do we have to make an effort to love someone? Various books say that you should love this or love that. This means that there is an effort involved in loving someone. Such love may have nothing to do with the deep state of emotion that one experiences when there is love. However, we are used to loving this way. We get emotional about our ideals and ideologies, which we call ‘love for our ideals.’ Somehow, we are attached to ideals, but we have no love for birds that we keep in cages for our amusement and animals, which are whipped and used to carry heavy burden, day after day. We have no compassion for the poor or beggars with torn clothes.

What Is Love?

What causes attachment to various things? Is this attachment love? What prevents the feeling of love in us? Can the state of love ever be described?

A person who is full of love, care and compassion may get emotional or even break down when he or she sees someone suffering. When someone we love dies, then we may naturally be in tears—not only for the suffering experienced by the person who has died but also for ourselves because our life changes and there is sadness without that individual. There is memory of the good and bad times, which brings out all our emotions. The memory and emotions wane with the passage of time. The memory is natural and cannot be wiped away through effort. It is natural to like someone who is pleasant and beautiful or be pleased with something that is sweet and gives us comfort. We may also feel sad for some time when a person moves away from us because our life was probably a bit more comfortable, livelier and happier with that person.

We may also have tears in our eyes simply because someone we are attached to has moved away from us. There is psychological dependence and attachment, which may give us a sense of passion. And there may be great loneliness and sorrow when the object of attachment (it could be a person or property) is lost or moves away.

The sorrow of loneliness may make us weep, but it is not love. It is difficult to come out of this loneliness because the thing that means everything to us is gone. But again, this is not love. When we are psychologically dependent and attached to someone, then we make the person’s life miserable by becoming possessive. But if we like someone without any attachment and feel affection and compassion for that person, then the relationship is healthy and pleasant. This is the manifestation of love.

3.1. Loneliness, Dependence, Attachment, and Possessiveness

Dependence on people and things may arise out of a physical need or a psychological need. A physical need is an actual need for a normal living body, depending on the situation and circumstances. Food, clothes, shelter and sex are some of the examples of the actual needs of a living person. A person may need someone to cook for him if he is too old or weak. This is also a natural need. The cause of physical dependence on a person or thing is always a natural biological urge or a physical necessity. If a person depends on the tailor for clothes, then it is because it is necessary to wear clothes while living in society. Perhaps it is more convenient or even necessary to get clothes stitched by an expert for various reasons. Similarly, if one needs a doctor’s help for treating his ill body, it is because he wants to be cured and get healthy.

We are all dependent on others for our physical needs. There is dependence on the employer for money, which is necessary to buy essential things. We depend on the mechanic to maintain and repair our car. When there is dependence on a person or thing, there is also the fear of losing the person or the fear of not getting the physical needs satisfied. When one is very young, then he or she depends on parents for food and other necessities of life. A child is perhaps a bit more dependent on parents or the guardian for the fulfilment of physical needs. But the young mind of the child is generally not worried about the faraway future. However, when we grow up, fear, insecurity and the need for planning emerge.

One can generally deal with physical dependence. Now, physical dependence is not so binding because either the need is satisfied or we can find another way of satisfying the physical need. We may even be able to live without the need, especially if it is not immediate. A person may need a cook to prepare food or an assistant to take care of him. But if the cook or assistant leaves, then he can find someone else to do the tasks. So, the fear that may arise from physical dependence does not necessitate possessiveness, because the dependence is not so binding. But if the dependence is too binding, then the fear of losing the person on which one is dependent is very high. This leads to possessiveness and causes various unnecessary problems.

Clinging to Memories, Running After Things

A psychological need is not an actual need but a need created by the mind, which wants to attain happiness by acquiring various things that are not needed to satisfy any biological urge. Sometimes, the mind thinks of wonderful sensations or good times from the past and runs after things that gave delight in the past but have no purpose or use now. Then it is merely trying to satisfy a psychological need. It is natural to have memories of the past, but problems occur when we want the previous experiences to be repeated. The mind lives in the illusion that repeating occurrences that gave delight in the past would give us the same sensations. There is conditioning by the society, which also makes us run after things that have no purpose in our lives. Yet we nurture the hope that acquiring them will bring happiness. Loneliness in relationships or daily life often forces a person to run after money, property, fame and political position. People crave unnecessary things, though they may have no actual utility or purpose in their lives.

It is healthy to be sensitive to the beauty of nature or the smile of a person and feel delight. These sensations are natural. It shows that our senses are alive. But very often, a sensitive person starts depending on these sensations and wants them to repeat. This is a futile exercise. However, this does not mean that we should become insensitive towards nature. It also does not mean we should stop enjoying the beauty around us. But it is necessary to free ourselves from the problem of dependence. The question that arises here is this: can we free ourselves from the problem of dependence while still being sensitive? The problem of dependence cannot be resolved by making an effort to free ourselves from it. The answer lies in understanding the whole problem. Then there is freedom from it. The problem of dependence leads to various other problems such as attachment, anxiety and possessiveness. The cause of psychological dependence on a person or thing is not a biological urge or a demand of the organism. The cause is loneliness, which again has a cause. The problems are connected to each other. So, only when we see the problem as a whole and understand its root cause, is there freedom from the problem.

Cause of Loneliness

To free ourselves from the problems of psychological dependence and loneliness, it is necessary to discover the cause of loneliness. Loneliness arises when the mind gives predominant importance to one thing and eventually isolates itself from other things. Whenever we compare our possessions, such as car and house, with that of others, who have a bigger or better car or house, this gives us a feeling of deficiency or emptiness. We feel that we are nobody. This feeling makes us want to achieve things that may have no use for us. The problem starts when we run after things for recognition and fame, because, in doing so, our mind gets caught in the pursuit of goals that have no end. Therefore, our action gets a bit limited. Now, when we have too much to achieve in a certain field, then most of our time is spent doing things within that particular area. We start ignoring our relationship with so many important things in life. Eventually, we lose the relationship and end up in isolation and loneliness.

The pursuit of the psychological needs on which the mind is dependent cannot fill this loneliness. In fact, it increases the loneliness. Thus, there is no freedom from dependence. Gradually, the dependence increases. The occupation with the object of dependence temporarily frees the mind from the problem of loneliness. But the occupation slowly strengthens the loneliness because it is causing isolation. When the loneliness is ever increasing and the dependence too is increasing, then the object of dependence becomes extremely important. Therefore, the psychological dependence becomes very binding on the mind. Also, the fear of losing the thing on which we are so badly dependent grows. This necessitates possessiveness and leads to various other problems.

There is no end to our psychological goals because loneliness can never be filled. There is no lasting satisfaction even when we achieve a certain goal. Our mind wants more and more. Secondly, we have acquired various morals, values and goals from society. We keep comparing ourselves with others in terms of these values and achievements. So, when we find that we have little compared to others, we want to achieve more. In doing so, our life gets reduced to a mere fragment, to which the mind gives importance. There is an unnecessary struggle and effort in this process. Instead of enjoying life, which is a vast movement, our living gets reduced to a particular field or fragment. Thus, the connection with the whole is lost. So, this lack of relationship with other things leads to isolation and loneliness. And the relationship with the one thing becomes a relationship of dependence. There is dependence on this one thing because there is no connection with other things. This causes extreme attachment, so much that if the thing is taken away from us, we experience complete emptiness or loneliness.

Connection with the Whole

The physical goals that arise out of a biological urge, a use or purpose do not become a hindrance. They are necessary for our living. Once they are satisfied, the mind does not run after them continuously. In pursuing physical needs, the connection with the whole is intact. This is because, once the biological need is satisfied, then there is no continuous activity within that particular field, until there is an urge for food, clothes and so on again. So, once these needs are satisfied, we may get involved with other things, depending on what we feel like doing at that time or what the situation demands. Therefore, the connection with the whole is not lost. There is a possibility that it may take some time (or even years) to accomplish a physical goal, like buying a house or car. But this does not mean that the connection with the whole is lost during that period, because we could still be sensitive towards our other needs and the things around us.

Physical needs and psychological needs flow into each other. Therefore, it would be worthwhile to discuss the differences that exist. Now, whether it is a physical need or a psychological need, the objects of desire stays the same because one needs a person, property or position to cover both kinds of needs. However, the difference is that the physical need is related to our survival or well-being. The psychological need has nothing to do with survival and well-being; it only covers our loneliness and satisfies the ego. One may need a house for living, which is a natural desire. He or she may even need two houses for various reasons and this can also be considered a natural desire. But if there is a need for several houses just for recognition and fame, then it is purely a psychological need.

Although a certain need might be physiological, the dependence could still be psychological. The dependence on a particular person or thing is a psychological dependence if our need can be fulfilled by another person or thing, but we are dependent and attached to a particular thing or person and want to fulfil our need only through this person or thing. For instance, we could be attached to a house or a chauffeur. We may want to live only in a particular house or want only a particular person to drive our car. Then, this is psychological dependence. However, this does not mean that we should not fulfil our needs with the help of a particular thing or person that we like. But dependence on the same thing or person has to be questioned.

A Note on Emotional Dependence

What we often call “emotional dependence” is, in reality, psychological. A passing memory or wave of emotion is natural and harmless—it does not create dependence. The problem arises when we pursue that memory or feeling in an attempt to fill an inner gap. It is this pursuit that binds us, setting in motion the familiar cycle: loneliness, dependence, attachment, possessiveness, and ultimately, back to loneliness. The memory may remain, and the emotion may arise, but without the pursuit, the self is not yet active, and there is no bondage.

If you want to take up an exercise to find out whether your particular dependence on various things is physical or psychological, then a few things might be worth looking at. We all depend on various people and things. It might be worth looking at some of the binding dependencies that we have. A physical dependence can be very binding too. For example, a person may be dependent on a particular doctor who is the only expert for his particular ailment. It may be very hard to imagine life without this person. But one has to question the nature of dependence and figure out if there is another person who is equally good. Another question one can think about is whether one always wants a particular thing or a person to fulfil his or her needs. Again, a certain thing may be always needed for a healthy life or survival. A person suffering from asthma may need an inhaler for survival and easy living. Even if there are alternatives available, one may want a particular thing that he or she likes the most, without being dependent on it psychologically. But one can question the nature of dependence if the thing one was dependent on has become obsolete.

So, if one is possessive of something even if there are alternatives or feels forever lonely after losing something that is not so important for physical well-being, then perhaps this indicates psychological dependence. Also, when a thing becomes so important that we lose our care for others and do not bother about anything around us, then it may be a strong indication of some psychological dependence. Although there are various obvious signs of psychological dependence, it may be very difficult to say with certainty that these are signs of psychological dependence. So, one has to look at his dependence from various angles and find out whether the dependence is natural or psychological.

Now, a physical need may be our personal need or someone else’s physical need. When we want to help others, then it is not a psychological desire, even though it is not our personal need. When we feel compassion or love for someone and want to do something for that person, then that is an actual need. It is not the need of our mind, unless our love is for an idea or we are doing something just for fame and recognition. The flame of compassion creates its own intelligence, and we may use our mind or knowledge to decide what to do. So, mind or knowledge is not the problem. Only when a particular knowledge becomes authority, based on which we make decisions and act, then the goal dictated by this knowledge is psychological.

Perils of Possessiveness

If we do not free ourselves from the problem of psychological dependence, then there is an attachment to the object of dependence, which may be money, property or another person. This attachment leads to possessiveness. When we become possessive of a person, then it binds the freedom of the individual, who is constantly being used and exploited by us. When the person whose freedom is restricted tries to run away or escape from this life of bondage, then he or she is condemned to be a ‘deceiver.’ And the person who is possessive is called a ‘true lover.’

But the truth is that the possessive person wants to make himself happy. What matters to him the most is his own self-interest. This is the cause of misery in the relationship, both for himself and the other person. The person who escapes from the life of bondage is only trying to protect himself from unnecessary trouble and conflict. Therefore, in a relationship, the person who is possessive has no love for the other, because he takes away the freedom of the other person and makes that person’s life miserable for his own self-interest. True love allows freedom in relationships — it does not bind or possess, but gives space for each person to grow and flourish. The act of possessiveness not only causes irritation, disturbance, discomfort and misery to the person who is being used but also destroys any love in that person and forces the person to move away from the relationship.

When there is a feeling of love, then this love is for everyone. Though one may love someone in particular, it does not mean he or she does not have love for others. However, a person who loves just one individual and is insensitive to everybody else is merely attached to that individual. This attachment may give him a sense of passion, but it has nothing to do with love. When a person is in love with somebody, then this does not mean that he cannot love another person. Love has no boundaries. When we have defined boundaries, then it is not love. It is something of the mind that is dependent, devoted and attached to a person or property. A person may be passionate or have love for something like architecture, designing buildings, playing cricket and so on. This is good, but if he wants to be at the top, then there is isolation and loneliness, which leads to dependence and attachment to one thing or the other.

Freedom from attachment does not mean that we should become detached and indifferent or isolate ourselves from others. Moreover, when we cultivate detachment, there is no freedom from the problem of attachment. We are still attached to detachment. When detachment becomes our goal, then we are caught in a conflict of opposites. There is a constant effort in trying to be detached and resisting attachment. However, what is necessary is a different kind of passion in which there is intensity but it must not be merely fixed on one thing. This kind of passion does not cause loneliness, psychological dependence or attachment. When one acts from the whole, then there is no authority of any concept or formula. Although one may be highly active and intense within a particular field, the intensity is not fixed at one point. But if one acts from the authority of knowledge, towards a fixed goal, then he is acting within a particular field to which he gets attached.

The root cause of all these psychological problems is the self or accumulated knowledge. This reduces the activity to a particular field, causing loneliness. This then leads to dependence, attachment, possessiveness and anxiety. Such behaviors are among the key signs of unhealthy relationships, which prevent genuine connection and growth between individuals. In seeing the root cause, the self disappears, and there is freedom from all problems. However, any effort to free ourselves from the self is still an action of the self or the continuation of the self. As long as the self remains, there is no freedom from problems.

Freedom from Problems

However, most people do not look at the problems. They just want to escape from them. And when they get bored with a particular escape route, they look for some other diversion. If all their escape options are taken away from them, they feel very lonely. There are people who devote their life to a particular person and become dependent on that person. If this person leaves them or breaks up with them, then they feel very lonely. There are various escape routes that may give some temporary relief from the feeling of loneliness. For instance, one can become religious, hold on to some belief, get involved in some spiritual activity or turn to politics. These things may give some temporary relief and one may feel that he has found the right calling, but they do not help in overcoming loneliness. He may claim to very happy, but the dependence on these things only causes further loneliness. A person who is dependent on beliefs or political position feels terribly lonely when the object of dependence is questioned, threatened or taken away from him.

One may also turn to drinks or drugs, which may make sensory organs, such as eyes or ears, very active. One may feel heightened sensitivity in a certain direction or towards a particular thing. But the moment its effects are over, there is loneliness. Perhaps the only notable difference between dependence on a person and dependence on a drug is that the person can leave us anytime and then we are left with our loneliness. It might be somewhat easier to find a drug and keep it with us.

Trapped!

It is important to understand the problems of loneliness, dependence and attachment and not look for various escape routes. What prevents enquiry is attachment itself, because we do not want to leave the thing that we are attached to. If we hold on to a belief or thing, then we do not want to question it, because it gives us some sort of security. Our enquiry may give the understanding that the thing we are attached to is worthless or completely useless. So we avoid questioning it.

Writers, artists, sportspersons, and various other professionals get trapped within the limits of their field because they want to be above everyone else in their field. A lot of people invest most of their time within a certain area. After some time, they get attached to it. And when they cannot remain active within that field, due to old age or some other reason, then there is tremendous loneliness. After retirement, many sportspersons, politicians and professionals feel very lonely because they had given importance to just one fragment of life. Now, this does not mean that we should not spend our time doing things that we have a passion for, as it is wonderful to do something that one loves doing. It is natural to spend time learning a certain skill in which one is interested in. Or we may pursue a skill that helps us find a job. All this is fine. The problem starts only when the pursuit becomes a thing of the mind and we want to be at the top. This reduces the action to a limited field and leads to loneliness, dependence and attachment.

However, I do not mean that the ones who strive for excellence become lonely. If one is passionate about something, then it is natural to learn as much as possible and become more and more skillful. All this does not lead to loneliness because one has other interests in his life and does not give importance merely to one thing and ignore the other things, unless the mind interferes and becomes the controller. But, when one wants to be at the top, then the passion is not for the thing but to be superior. When the mind is caught up with something, then there is no end to this race. This reduces the activity within a limited field. When the mind, heart and body are in harmony, then there is balance, but if the mind controls everything, then there is imbalance. A person who is in harmony may be at the top or bottom: it does not matter, but he is not lonely. Similarly, a person who does not have this balance may be at the top or bottom, but he soon finds himself very lonely.

Aloneness versus Loneliness

There is sorrow and self-pity due to loneliness. But there is a difference between standing lonely and standing alone. Loneliness is painful, but aloneness is freedom from all conditioning, which brings joy. One needs strength to stand alone. When the mind has freed itself from the self or accumulated knowledge that has become a centre in the brain, then there is a state of ‘aloneness.’ Aloneness is different from loneliness. In loneliness, there is the authority of knowledge and no relationship with people or nature. There is isolation. When the ideas dominate our mind, then there is no sensitivity. However, in aloneness, there is freedom from knowledge, ego and the self. There is sensitivity in the true sense and a real relationship. Many religious people try to isolate themselves, but they are acting from the authority of their beliefs, dogmas and accumulated knowledge. They are never alone. In aloneness, there is freedom from the great burden of ideologies, and there is happiness.

There is a state of solitude, which has its importance. In solitude, one can discover the state of his loneliness. However, most of the time, we want to be with somebody and keep ourselves busy to forget or escape from our worries. But when one escapes in such a manner, then there cannot be any understanding of one’s loneliness or other problems. When the problem is really immense, then there is awareness, which comes naturally. We want to turn off the television or we ask people at home not to make too much noise, so that we can delve into the problem. Periods of quiet solitude are sometimes important to go deeper into our psychological issues.

3.2. Conflict in Relationships

Now, let us examine what prevents the actual communion between individuals. When one looks through coloured sunglasses, then the objects appear to be a bit different in colour than what they are actually. Similarly, when we watch everything through our knowledge, opinions and prejudices, then our vision gets distorted. Our observation, from particular knowledge, is coloured by our perception of what is good and what is bad or what is wrong and what is right. This observation is very limited. This is because we are observing the other person on our own terms and our vision gets somewhat restricted by the rights and wrongs.

This partial observation prevents actual sensitivity, because when the observation is limited to our wants, rights and wrongs, then we cannot be sensitive towards the problems and needs of others. When a person is concerned only about himself and the other person is also concerned about himself, then there is no real relationship between the two people; there is just isolation.

There are various wants and demands that arise from time to time in our relationships with others. But they do not prevent the communion between people. When there is psychological dependence, then the object of dependence becomes so important that it limits our observation to our wants. So, we are actually not concerned about the needs or welfare of others. Thus, there is no real connection with people, nature or anything else around us. The relationship is mostly limited to the use that others provide. But when there is freedom from the self, then there is complete observation. Though we may be sensitive to our own needs, we are also sensitive towards other things.

Observation and Image

The observation from the centre, that is the ‘I,’ creates an image of the other person. This in turn creates a psychological space between individuals, making genuine connection difficult and causing relationship conflict. When one looks at the other person through the centre (‘I’), which includes all ideals of right and wrong, then the observation creates an image of the other person. This is ‘not I,’ which is the ‘you.’ And there is a psychological space between the ‘I’ and the ‘you.’ There is a psychological space between the individuals when they are far away from each other in ideals, opinions, goals and ideologies. Also, there is very limited contact between each other due to the limited observation of each other. If two people have the same images, then they may be able to get along with each other. But when the images are different, then there is conflict. So, accumulated knowledge creates a psychological space between two people.

Now, if there is no centre (‘I’), then there would be no measurement in terms of right or wrong and therefore no image of ‘you.’ But there would be total observation. So, the observation from the image ‘I’ creates the image of ‘you.’ Consequently, when we look at another person from this image ‘you,’ then we are merely comparing him or her with the image we have. Thus, there is no complete observation. However, in the absence of the centre ‘I,’ there may still be image formation of another person, who is dangerous or has caused some serious physical hurt. Then it becomes difficult to connect with such people.

Acting according to the previous image of the person, which we have in our minds, prevents any relationship. But this does not mean that we should assume that the person has changed and act according to the assumption. An individual who had been selfish or inconsiderate in the past could have changed and become better. Or he or she could have become more insensitive than earlier. A kind and a nice person may have also changed. He or she may not be nice and good anymore or in a particular situation. Thus, it is important to use our intelligence. We must use images only when necessary. This way, the relationship is a living thing and is not merely an activity based on ideas.

Knowledge is necessary to protect ourselves from danger, keep us healthy, and make our life comfortable. The fact that a snake is dangerous or can be dangerous is knowledge that is necessary. We may have an image of a criminal or a habitual offender whom we know is dangerous and violent and has committed various offences. Such knowledge is also necessary. Such knowledge is essential to protect ourselves from any possible danger. Scientific knowledge is also vital to keep us healthy, stave off diseases, and treat the problems in our body. However, in a relationship, it is not necessary to have an image of someone and look at this person from this image, just because of a previous instance or behaviour. Remember that any particular behaviour, at a particular instance, could have been caused due to various reasons, such as improper diet, improper sleep, unhealthy lifestyle or alcohol consumption. Also, in a relationship – especially with our partner or a friend – even if a particular behaviour is repeated, it might be worth getting deeper into it before drawing any conclusion(s).

When there is no accumulated knowledge in the brain to direct our thoughts, there is no self. Our thoughts are not in conflict with the other thoughts in our brain, because there is no centre that guides us or resists our thinking. So, the thoughts that arise from time to time do not breed any conflict in the brain. Also, when there is no self, then our thinking is not mechanical. There is spontaneity, which is wisdom. So, there is no mechanical thinking or mechanical action. There are no ideals or ideologies. There is no particular behaviour within a pattern. There are no ideals of right or wrong that could come in conflict with the ideals and beliefs of others. This means there is no cause for conflict with the world.

However, a person who is conditioned may still enter into a conflict with a person who is free from ideologies and concepts. He may even call the free person immoral or foolish, but the conditioned person is the cause of conflict. There is a conflict in his brain and he is in conflict with the world. But the individual who is free from the self deals with situations according to his intelligence, without the authority of knowledge. He acts spontaneously. A spontaneous action does not mean acting instantly without thinking, but it means acting without the authority of any knowledge, though one may use thought and knowledge or take time to decide. However, if both individuals are conditioned, then there is not too much difference between them. Though they may have different ideals, they are essentially similar because they are both conditioned. There is a conflict in their brain and they are in conflict with each other and with most of the world.

A person who follows any ideal is cultivating a value and resisting its opposite. This means that deep inside, he is in conflict or opposing the opposite of what he is cultivating. Now, when deep inside, we are opposed to something and avoid it continuously, then how can we accept the person who follows what we are opposed to? We are bound to be in conflict with that person because deep inside we are opposed to the other person’s values. (Of course, we may accept the person superficially or pretend to accept him or her.) We also tend to defend the values that we have acquired. This means we are bound to be in conflict with anyone who condemns or attacks our values.

An idealist deeply feels that his values are superior to the values of others because if all values are equal, then there is no need to accept one or a few and reject the others. And when there is this feeling of superiority and inferiority, then there will be the feeling of contempt against others.

Knowledge Causes Conflict

Psychological knowledge, which includes concepts, ideals, ideologies, beliefs and systems, not only causes inner conflict within us but also creates distance between nations, groups, communities and religions. Although our ideologies speak about peace and brotherhood, we have separated ourselves from each other and we sometimes even kill each other. Now, this knowledge has caused a gap or a space between people. Then, the mind invents another method or an idea to cover this gap, so that we can all live in peace. However, method means knowledge. What is important to understand here is that any particular knowledge is only a fragment of the whole. The fragment does not contain the whole. So, giving importance to any particular knowledge will cause division. It will not bring us together. In fact, it will always divide us. One person holds on to one fragment and the other person holds on to another. Then we are fighting with each other about which fragment is right.

Question of Tolerance

Then there is the question of tolerance. There are people who talk about cultivating tolerance for those who differ from them in beliefs and ideals and who also advise others to cultivate tolerance. However, the need for tolerance comes only when we are in conflict with another person and there is lack of love and understanding of others. When we are in a healthy relationship with someone, then we do not say that we are “tolerating” that person. If we are not in conflict with another person, and the other person is in conflict with us, then too there is no need for the ideal of tolerance, but one does what is necessary, which may mean tolerating or educating him. And if we are in conflict with the others and the others are in conflict with us, then it is not the ideal of tolerance that is important, but it is our conflict with the others that is important and must be looked at and understood.

Secondly, a mind that is cultivating tolerance is still intolerant because it is intolerant to the fact of intolerance that it is experiencing. Now, our beliefs, ideas, and ideologies have caused conflict and division with people who do not belong to the same class of thinking. So, experts have come up with the word ‘tolerance,’ which means even though we differ in beliefs and ideals, we should have acceptance and patience for each other. Tolerance then becomes another belief, and this belief still separates us from the ones who have opposing views on tolerance. What is important is to be free from the cause of this unnecessary division and conflict in society.

Also, if one person believes in war and the other person believes in peace, then there cannot be any relationship between the two. If both of them assert the authority of their ideal, then they are bound to be in conflict with each other. Now, if we believe in the ideal of peace and also have an ideal of tolerance, then it will not be easy for us to deal with someone who believes in war. If we say that we should have tolerance for the other person, it means we are accepting his ideal of war and not educating him about the consequences of war and violence. We are not in conflict with our ideal of tolerance because we tolerate. But we are in conflict with our ideal of peace because we accept the other person’s ideal of war. However, if we challenge his ideal of war, then we go against our ideal of tolerance, because we are being intolerant towards his ideal of war. So, it becomes very difficult for us to act in such a situation. If a person is free from all ideals, then he or she is free to act and do whatever is necessary in a particular situation.

Now, if someone says that the ideals, concepts and ideologies are destructive for the world, then he or she may be looked upon as a person who is intolerant towards various ideologies and theories. If the person puts up with anything and everything, even if it is destructive, then though he or she may be called tolerant and may also get a lot of respect for her ideal of tolerance. But the person is not at peace within or at peace with the world. Two people with opposing views may try to establish some relationship with each other, but their opposing views only create conflict. Any particular knowledge never unites people. It always divides. Even the people who believe in the same thing are still divided into various sects and sub groups.

However, to be free of the ideal of tolerance does not mean that we should become intolerant towards people who have beliefs, ideologies and ideals. But when one understands himself, then he understands the other. From this understanding, there stems a different kind of quality in the mind. There is love, and there is no need for tolerance in a cunning mind. A person who has love in his heart may try to establish a relationship with someone who is acting according to his or her conditioning. However, this person who is conditioned will have no relationship with the person who has love and compassion, until he or she is free from the bondage of knowledge and ideologies.

The more we cling to particular views and a particular pattern of life, the more hatred there is towards people who challenge our views and way of living. We get attached to life within the pattern because it’s a kind of life that we have been living for a long time. We would feel lonely without this kind of life, which we are very used to. So, we become defensive, and there is hatred and antagonism towards people who question or threaten our object(s) of attachment.

Some of the consequences of unresolved relationship conflict are explored further in the chapter on Hurt (Image, Hurt, and Forgiveness) and the chapter on Anger (Anger, Violence, Peace, and Global Planning). While these chapters may provide additional insights, reading the book in its natural order may give the clearest understanding.

3.3. Freedom, Sensitivity, and Love

The Meaning of Love

Love is a vast movement, which cannot be described in words. When we give a certain name to love, then it means that we have imagined it to have a certain quality. We all have certain ideas of love. We also call parts of love as love. However, we must understand that the whole contains the part but the part does not contain the whole. Therefore, the part of love which we call ‘love’ cannot be love. When there is love, then there is a strong desire for what we love. There is a state of tremendous passion, joy or pleasure.

Love is beyond pleasure or desire. Though it includes both, we cannot limit love to pleasure or desire. When love is limited, then it is not love. Then it means the mind gives preference to a particular fragment. In a relationship, if we merely care about our desire and pleasure and care very little about other things, then the feeling we experience is not really love. Love has no meaning in this context.

When we are drawn towards an idea and start following it, then the movement gets limited to a certain field. There is an attachment to a particular idea. We then give importance to a particular fragment, while ignoring the other fragments. When love becomes a thing of the mind or an idea to be pursued, then it can merely be a particular fact of love or certain facts of love. Love for a tiny fragment, while ignoring a vast movement, cannot be love.

For instance, there are so many fanatical movements in this world with endless passion for an idea, like communism, nationalism and Nazism. These movements kill so many people who do not belong to their country or community. Such passion has nothing to do with love.

The movies tell us what love is or what love should be. And then there is the formation of the idea of love in our minds, which becomes all important to us. Religious books also tell us about love and the idea of love for God; they tell us to devote our lives to this idea even though we don’t know anything about God. And then there are patriotic people who speak about the love for their country. So, we have various ideas about what we can do and what we cannot do in love. And these ideas become very important. When we are in a relationship with someone, then we come up with rules. We want the other person in the relationship to follow these rules. Each person in the relationship is trying to brainwash the other, depending on their conditioning. This is not love but selfishness.

We have a lot of ideas and thoughts about love. We look at love as something of the past or something to be achieved in the future. This is not love. Love is a living thing, which takes a new form from moment to moment. If we call a particular kind of act as love and say that we will love a particular person tomorrow, then it is of no value.

What Love Is Not

The ‘self ’ prevents actual observation, sensitivity and love. One must be careful that love is not the outcome of denying the self through an effort. When we make an effort to free ourselves from the self, then we are merely following a particular method, which implies acting from certain knowledge. This is still the continuation of the self. It is the understanding of the self that gives freedom from the self. And when there is no self, then we see things clearly and there is sensitivity, which is not limited to certain things that are important to the conditioned mind.

There are many people who cultivate the opposite of hatred and violence and call it love. However, the opposite of hatred cannot be love, because every opposite contains in it its own opposite (please refer to the chapter on non-duality). So, the opposite of hatred would still contain hate and therefore it cannot be love.

Love cannot be practised and one cannot cultivate love through various efforts. If one says that he will do this or that thing to reach the state of love, then it has no meaning because one cannot attain love through methods. Also, if someone loves a particular person merely because he or she has something to gain from that person, then there is a cause. But love has nothing to do with a cause. Many codependent relationships are built on such causes — where affection is exchanged for security or validation — but this is not love. When two people are in love with each other, then though they may have something to gain from each other, their love for each other is not dependent on a certain cause. Moreover, one may be in love with somebody from whom he/she may have nothing to gain. When there is love, then we care infinitely for everyone, including animals, birds and other human beings, though they may have nothing to give us or we may have never met them before in life. It is this love that expresses itself in everything that we do. Without this love, there cannot be passion that is free from a cause. In the absence of love, life becomes boring even if we fill it up with various worldly possessions.

Sensitivity in Relationships

Most of us are conditioned by various factors. And this conditioning keeps us psychologically far away from each other, even when we are very close to each other physically. When two people are free from the self or the ego, then the psychological space between them, which is created by ‘me’ and ‘you,’ comes to an end. Now, when this psychological space ends, then there is a real connection between the individuals because there is an actual seeing or observation. When there is clear observation, there is real sensitivity — not merely emotional sensitivity, but physical, mental, and emotional awareness. And then there is love, which is a living movement. Without sensitivity, there cannot be love. To be totally sensitive, there must be actual seeing or actual contact. There cannot be actual contact or seeing when we give importance to just one fragment, through which we look at the other person. When there is seeing or there is contact, then what happens in this fused state of sensitivity cannot be put into words because it not a fixed movement. It is a living movement, which is new from moment to moment. When there is communion with something at the mental, physical and emotional level, then this communion itself is love.

A healthy mind that is free from the self and a healthy body are necessary to be sensitive. To have a sensitive mind and body, we must have a healthy lifestyle, which includes right diet, right clothes, right sleep and right exercises. If we follow an unhealthy lifestyle with heavy foods, improper sleep and no exercises, then we cannot be healthy. The body becomes lethargic and unfit and is not physically sensitive. It also does not have a sensitive mind. Such a mind is not intelligent.

Without intelligence, we cannot have compassion, and without compassion there is no intelligence. Extreme thoughtfulness and intelligence help with understanding. This understanding gives us freedom from the self, ego or accumulated knowledge. This, in turn, frees us from conflict and misery. In this freedom, there is love and compassion. This compassion creates its own intelligence.

Without the feeling of love, when we do good according to a formula or knowledge, then our actions may have little impact. If we do not go deep into someone’s problem, there is very little that can be done. However, this does not mean that we should not be kind to others. But without the feeling of love, our kindness may have very little meaning. Our kindness is also of no use if it is not done with sensitivity.

In India, when we visit our friends or relatives in their house, we are served different kinds of food. We are constantly persuaded to eat even if we are not hungry. This is people’s way of treating their guests. Hospitality is important to them, not what the other person feels or wants. Their action is not out of love but out of their idea of hospitality.

Let me give you another example. There is a joke that once a teacher told his students that they should help old people cross the road. The next day, a student came back and told the teacher that he had helped an old lady cross the road but she had been furious with him. The teacher asked the student why the lady was furious. The student said that the lady wanted to remain on the same side of the road and did not want to cross it. But because the teacher had told him that helping old people cross the road was a virtuous act, he had done so. The student did not bother to find out if his help was required or not. He was not sensitive to the needs of others.

Now, this does not mean we should do away with non-governmental organisations, which are the result of planning and thinking. These organisations are necessary. What I am trying to say is don’t follow the blueprint blindly. There must be some spontaneity to deal with immediate challenges.

If we merely act according to a particular formula, then all our thoughts and actions are repeated within a particular pattern. There is no new response posed by a new challenge. Moreover, the organisations that are part of some ideology, theories and ideals come in conflict with other organisations that have different ideals and theories. This is one of the causes of disintegration of society.

True Love

When there is true love, then there is no need to verbally express it explicitly. It may not be necessary to say ‘I love you’ because love flows through words, gestures and other actions even without verbalising it. However, this does not mean that one should not express it if he or she wants to. When there is true love, then there is real caring for each other. We are sensitive towards each other’s needs even when there is no help sought. The one who has needs may not want to bother the other person unnecessarily for his personal needs. But the other person may still want to fulfil his needs even if he does not demand it.

There is care and a feeling of responsibility in the real sense. However, this is not a concept of love. It does not mean that when someone is in love, then he or she should not demand anything from the other person. We all have different needs that arise from time to time and sometimes it is necessary to tell others and ask for help. A person may be sick and may need to inform the partner and seek his/her help with various needs that may arise in that situation. If a person is ill and needs some urgent attention or even if there isn’t an urgent need, but one needs some advice in a tricky situation, or one is occupied with too many tasks and wants someone to lessen his burden, then it may be necessary to seek assistance. In a true relationship, there is consideration for one another, which flows naturally and is not based on any prescribed formula.

Now, we care about others and look after each other even when we are not in love, but this is only because we want something in return. Outwardly, this care may appear very similar to the care expressed in love. But this kind of care generally only lasts as long as the other person is useful to us or as he/she can give comfort, sex, money and so on. This care has nothing to do with love but is merely like a business transaction.

When two people look at each other through the screen of their wants and find that they are useful to each other and can fulfil each other’s demands, then there may be connection between them. But if the connection depends upon someone’s usefulness, then it has nothing to do with love. When there is no love in a relationship, then there may blame games. People can accuse each other of ruining the relationship and not showing enough care. When there is love and compassion, then there is consideration, affection and adjustment to live together happily.

There are always ups and downs in a relationship. All of us make mistakes in a relationship, even in a relationship of love. But we can always admit our faults and confess to our mistakes. We can also say sorry when it is necessary. However, egoistic people may not want to admit their mistake because it hurts their pride. They may want the other person to apologise. This causes ill will and irritation towards the other person and destroys the relationship. A person who is egoistic and lives a life of conflict has no love. A relationship with this person may not be fun. It can cause constant irritation to the people around him.

Relationship is a process of discovering ourselves. In this process of discovery, there flows endless love. And then there is constant adjustment to take care of and be responsible towards each other.

Problem of Sex, Chastity and Licentiousness

When we see something beautiful, be it a mountain, the sunset, or a person, then it is very natural to feel some kind of good sensation. There is nothing wrong in this. But some people from various religions have condemned looking at a woman. There are people who take the vows of abstaining themselves from having any sex and torture themselves during the life. This suppression keeps the mind in constant conflict.

Some people go to the other extreme and say that it is completely acceptable to stare at women and even stalk them. These people are also acting from certain knowledge in their brains. A person who is free from all accumulated knowledge is sensitive to every movement that is going on around him. And he is capable of acting in the right way. Such a person knows how to live life fully. At the same time, he is also sensitive and considerate towards others.

It is natural for us to like someone or be attracted to something that is beautiful and pleasing. But this has to be dealt with sensitivity. A person who is inconsiderate towards others and merely cares about his happiness and comfort is insensitive. There is immense happiness in seeing a beautiful bird flying in the sky, but if we put it in a cage and keep it for our own pleasure, then we are insensitive towards the bird. A person may take care of the bird kept in the cage but it does not mean that he loves it. He may take actions that suggest care for the bird. But this is because the bird is necessary for his personal happiness and not because he really cares for the happiness of the bird.

Using Our Intelligence

When we are very young, our mind is not very mature to decide what is the correct thing to do. There are various influences that impact our thinking and behaviour. There is also a possibility of getting influenced or trapped by various philosophies and ideologies that suit our desires. It is not very wise to follow anyone’s philosophies because they generally take into consideration one aspect or a few aspects of life.

We must not rely on anyone in life. We must try and find the answers to our problems with our own intelligence and a free mind. If someone says that he does not care about how his actions affect others and would do whatever he feels like doing, then he is actually following a philosophy—of giving importance to just one fragment, which is his own desires.

When we are in our teens and early twenties, then there may be a very strong desire for sex. There are parents and others who want us to avoid getting into a relationship and avoid any indulgence in sex. On the other hand, there is a strong desire towards a person of the opposite sex and the urge to get into a relationship with this person. In the Western world and many other developing countries, there is the problem of teen pregnancy. There are so many people who take drugs and enter into casual sexual relationships without considering the law, pregnancy or other consequences and eventually become parents during their early teenage years. This severely impacts the life of the newborn babies.

Now, this does not mean that we should suppress our desires. But we must not yield to our desires all the time without considering anything else, as this means living a fragmentary life. However, the intention is not to say desires are right or wrong or must be avoided or indulged in. But there is no harm in listening to people who are concerned about us and seeing if what they are saying makes sense. It may be worth using our intelligence to consider the necessary things, such as the law of the land, consequences, precautions and so on. Then we can decide, with a free mind, what we should do or not do, so that we and the others around us do not face unnecessary problems in the future.

Sex has become an immense problem among human beings. Although it is a biological necessity, we also indulge in it in order to escape from our worries and troubles, and so it becomes a psychological need too. In a relationship, there is the memory of good times and good sex, which might be natural, but when the mind seeks pleasure and wants to repeat previous joy, then it may lead to the formation of a habit. A lot of times, there is habitual sex, which is without the biological urge. We indulge in it only to get away from our worries and to seek happiness. When we get bored with this habitual sex, then we look for new escapes.

When our partner separates and moves away from us, then there is enormous loneliness if we are attached and dependent on that person. Also, if our partner divorces us and marries someone else, then there is jealousy, anger and hatred, as if he/she is our property. Although we may blame the person for our agony and pain, the real cause is our own mind, which is dependent psychologically on another person. However, this does not mean that one should not be a family person and leave his/her partner and run away with someone else. That would be foolish. But psychological dependence has to be questioned.

Chastity and Licentiousness

Then there is a problem of chastity and licentiousness. Some people have their own ideals of chastity. Some believe in the opposite, which is being licentious. However, when there are ideals, then there is the ‘self ’ or the ‘ego,’ and then there is no space for love.

Now, we all have biological urges of food and sex. It is natural to have biological urges if one is a healthy person. Besides, there is nothing good or bad about sex. It is natural to pursue our biological needs. If they can be satisfied while being sensitive to others and the whole situation, then there is nothing wrong. Obviously, one has to obey the law too. But when the mind is pursuing pleasure, thinking that sex will give happiness, even though there is no biological urge, then such a mind is unchaste. Chastity means purity. But when the mind is pursuing the ideal of chastity and is resisting a particular desire, then it is running away from the fact. This cannot be pure; it is unchaste. Also, the mind that seeks happiness through sex, by exaggerating the desire of sex, is escaping from the fact of ‘what is’ and is therefore unchaste.

When the mind is free from the self, there is love. Then sex has its own beauty. The ideal of chastity is something that stems from the mind. And what the mind has created is merely an illusion. It is not the actual state that one is experiencing. The mind continues to remain in this state, from which one is running away. There is nothing pure about it and is thus unchaste. There should be freedom from the concepts of ‘this is right’ and ‘that is wrong’ or ‘I should do this’ and ‘I should not do that.’ This does not mean freedom from the authority of law because one has to obey the law, but there must be freedom from concepts and ideals, which control our actions. This does not mean that one should become licentious, but when there is intelligence with compassion and the mind is not controlled by any particular knowledge, then there is an action, which is correct. So, it is important to question and doubt all ideals and ideologies and be a light to oneself.

Several spiritual teachers have given tremendous importance to sex. Some have even said that we can reach a state of ‘super consciousness’ through sex. I do not know what they mean by the term ‘super consciousness’ because I have not read a lot of literature on this. But I have heard about this from people. The brain is quiet at the time of sex or when a person sees a beautiful thing like a mountain or enjoys a sport. So, there is timelessness not only during sex but also at other times when we are enjoying something or are busy with something. However, such stillness is only at the superficial or conscious level. It is momentary. Real silence comes when the unconscious is discovered and understood.

Sadly, many gurus and priests have sexually exploited their students or disciples in the name of timelessness. Every other day, there is a new story involving a priest, guru or pastor. So, religion for many is merely a tool for making a lot of money and feeding their egos. Thus, they are involved in various kinds of exploitation.

Freedom, sensitivity, and love naturally arise from the understanding and freedom from conflict discussed in this subchapter. These themes are discussed further in Non-Duality, though reading the chapters sequentially may give the most complete understanding.